Author: Edmund White on his "Lives"
As you all know by now, I went to see Edmund White read excerpts from his new autobiographical book, “My Lives.” While most of White’s books are autobiographical fiction, “My Lives” is a completely non-fictional account of his life so far. I love the way this book is structured. Instead of a linear approach, White writes about specific aspects of his life that shaped him, in away that demonstrates the circularity of life—the motifs that exist in an individual life. And the fact that a person can live many different lives in one lifetime. For example, the first chapter is My Shrinks. In that chapter, White chronicles his adventures in psychotherapy—first in hopes of curing his homosexuality, then to help him accept his gayness, then to help him mourn the loss of his partner to AIDS. Other chapters include, My Father, My Hustlers, My Women, etc. Written in simple elegant yet witty prose, “My Lives” is a real page turner.
In the question and answer segment, one of White’s former students (there were quite a few in attendance) commented on the change in his writing style. In his earlier works, of which I am most familiar, White had an elegant, lyrical yet flamboyant style that demonstrated his mastery of the written word as well as his love affair with the thesaurus. His current style is simple and easy, demonstrating that brilliance has no need for pomposity. The questioner asked which style he preferred. White said he prefers the way he writes now, because in the past he felt that as a homosexual he had more to prove. He quipped that some of his past works are so dense that even he has difficulty understanding them today.
White has a magnetic smile. He is both personable and patient. He seemed like he has exorcized most of his demons. White currently teaches at Princeton, and has taught at many other prestigious schools, including: Brown, Columbia, Yale, John Hopkins, etc. Ironically, White gave up his chance to attend Harvard in order to continue treatment for his “disease,” so committed he was to a cure. For White, nothing less than heterosexuality was acceptable. “If someone had tried to refute my horror of homosexuality I would have instantly rejected his insinuating proposal, tempting me to settle for second best. I knew that only the most insulting pity and condescension would lead someone to recommend that I surrender to my disease.” This is the guy who co-authored “The Joy of Gay Sex—An Intimate Guide for Gay Men to the Pleasures of a Gay Lifestyle;” further proof that we live many lives.
The dynamics of homosexual relationships were also broached. One woman asked about what she saw as the tragic need of some gay people to conform to normative heterosexual notions of commitment, i.e., marriage. White stated that he views gay relationships as more of a best friend type deal than a marriage per se. However, he gave value to those who wished to formalize their relationship with the State. He also voiced a phenomenon that I have also noticed. He stated that after gay couples break up, they are likely to remain friends while heterosexual tend to bitterly part ways. This made no sense to White, who does not see how two people who were so intimately intertwined, and saw value in each other, would all of a sudden despise one another. He also stated that gay couples tend not to keep their partner on as tight a leash as straight couples. I must say that this is probably due to the fact that infidelity poses a greater risk for straight couples--the fear of unwanted pregnancy stemming from antiquated notions about property rights for instance. Anyway, I was surprise to hear White say that of his friends that are in long-term committed relationship (like 30 years or more) most of them are gay. That flies in the face of conventional wisdom.
All in all, it was a nice read. I’m glad I went. I got White’s autograph – even though autographs aren’t really my thing. White also gave me the names of three new gay fiction authors he admires: Robert Hughes, Patrick Ryan, Vestal McIntyre and Barry McCrea, check them out, see what they’re all about. Happy reading.
4 Comments:
So he refers to homosexuality as "disease?" I don't get it.
It sounds like his writing style has become less stuffy over time. I am very interested in reading his current book. Non-fiction.
I wonder if over time his writing became more his voice, because he became more comfortable with himself. I remember my friend Marie would tell me when I was in my 20s, "Kito your 30s are so much fun. You have so much fun because you're more comfortable with who you are. You're willing to take risk and just be you." I was very excited about my 30s. I broke up with a long-term boy friend, there goes 200 pounds, I went skydiving, watch out birds, dated a bunch of guys, had fun sex, started taking acting class, and well here I am. Give me something impracticable. I'm going to take surfing lessons. I may learn how to walk on stilts, in between learning Chinese and keeping up with Spanish and Japanese, if I get time. I am going to work with artist, children, and immigrants -- mainly in a legal capacity. So much fun.
Funny thing, I mentioned to Marie and thanked her for her whole "30s are fabulous speech," and well, you know what she said? Marie doesn't remember telling me anything about "30s are fabulous." She now says that the 40s are more fun. She's gone sailing all over, she has to beat 20-something, young, hot, energetic, good-looking men off of her with a stick. Oh, and she got her her dream job. Marie is part anthropologist (Master's degree) and part producer (t.v. and cable producer). Well, she works for some kind of production company in which she works on a mult-million dollar Nevada museum project. Among other things, she researches and produces the video that will describe the different museum exhibit.
Go Marie.
1973. That's too bad that it was considered a disease for so long. Next time we borrow something from another civilization or culture I hope it's acceptance of others.
Did you see "Dog Day Afternoon," which was released in 1975? I have to send you this book called "Audition" by Michael Schertlaff. In ways Shurtlaff writes about "Dog Day Afternoon." I saw it long ago, but decided to watch it again. It was based on a true story. Robert Deniro's character robbed a bank, so he could get money for his male lover's sex change operation. They actually found a priest that married them. Deniro's character was married to a woman too.
I meant Al Pacino not Rober Deniro.
"Dog Day Afternoon" is on my list. Remember I'm reading "Making Movies" by Sidney Lumet -- the director of "Dog Day." Maybe you could be a guess commentator on my blog and comment on "Dog Day." That would be cool.
I figured you meant Al Pacino--the two are easily mistaken for each other.
Post a Comment
<< Home